Alphism in Males and Females
     By Leigh Bent PhD, D.Sc. 

I am delighted that the world includes in its welcome of variety that sub-species of human commonly referred to as Alpha, though members of that ubiquitous, self-satisfied classification hardly know themselves, let alone call themselves, by that name. Alphas self-identify as ordinary human beings. 
     By scientific consensus worldwide, according to painstaking analysis of the most recent census data available, generated by laboratories, universities and think tanks around the globe, and compiled with international oversight at King’s College, Oxford, alpha humans number 2,400,349,866 individuals, with the data skewing the numbers slightly in favour of the female sex. Publishing of these findings has so far been scant since officially agreement has not yet been reached because it is generally conceded that some claims of inaccuracy have been published by female scientists who consequently have submitted an official recantation of the finding’s conclusions, citing gender bias and arguing that the tallying of numbers typically and regularly slants information, from even controlled experiments, in favour of males who constitute an estimated 74% of scientists engaged in overseeing the myriad experiments. Boasting fully one quarter of the earth’s population, Alphism, increasing at an alarming rate globally as it is, must be considered to have become a dominant form of human psycho-evolution.           
     Research shows that, contrary to the expectations of the scientific community, both sexes rate, on the Sliding Harvard Compatibility and Authority Scale, as both equally likely to exhibit 97.6% of empirically established characteristics associated with the alphac, of which 421 such traits have so far been formally identified. And in each case, with an average intensity of expression of the trait firmly determined through controlled experimentation as slightly less equal at 95.2%, the conclusion becomes indisputable that alpha male and alpha female behaviours must be considered indistinguishable 97 times out of 100, with a statistical deviation of slightly less than 2%. 
         .